Archive for MiB Forums Burning Up Time Forums
 


       MiB Forums Forum Index -> Rumours
mctownie

Would Paul have left if Baz hadnt joined - I dont think so!

Has Baz unwittingly caused the end of Paul Roberts' Stranglers career???

It was obvious to many of us a few years ago when we realized that Baz could sing that a natural progression or regression could be back to a 4 piece band and Paul was suddenly dispensable.

Now if a guitarist who couldnt sing had replaced John Ellis then surely the option of 'letting' Paul go wouldnt have occured.

I think it would have been very difficult credibility wise to replace a 'karokee frontman' with another karokee frontman (harsh I know)where as to basically not replace him (allowing JJ to sing all his old songs again) reverting back to the 4 piece act that many of us still look back to fondly, as JJ put it would not lose any of the fan base and maybe even increase it?!?!

Has JJ been waiting for the right moment to ditch PR? If Baz had been in the band when him and Paul werent getting on during and after the Coup De Farce album I personally think he would have gone then.
PaulinLondon

Interesting point by why put all the effort (including Paul's) into the writing and production of Norfolk Coast which resulted in the deserved re-emergence of the band ? That album must have taken a lot of hard work by all five of the members.

I do believe that difficulties surfaced post Norfolk Cost and possibly on the back of Norfolk Coast.
MULLY

Why go to all the bother &/or pretence of recording all the new songs on 'Suite XVI' with PR on vocals if this decision was made a while ago?

IMHO I think this all came about quite recently - albeit, there may have been 'rumblings of discontent' post NC - but why waste money/studio time etc.. and then re-record the vocals post split? Doesn't make sense to me.
mctownie

MULLY wrote:
Why go to all the bother &/or pretence of recording all the new songs on 'Suite XVI' with PR on vocals if this decision was made a while ago?

IMHO I think this all came about quite recently - albeit, there may have been 'rumblings of discontent' post NC - but why waste money/studio time etc.. and then re-record the vocals post split? Doesn't make sense to me.


Yes very true but the option to easily ditch Paul and carry on as a 4 piece band was always there once Baz fitted in so well and gets on so well with the founder members of the band. Aafter obvious disagreements about what tracks go on the new album (this option wasnt available after coup de farce) Paul is now no longer in the band. Without Baz this wouldnt have happened.
ALV2500

I wont dispute that Paul did have "some" talent but is he in the same league as the others ???

Give me a break.........N0 FRIGGIN WAY !!!!!!!!!!!!!

Paul had a good voice, I give him that. Unfortunately, if you want to front a band like the stranglers, you need much more.

Paul didn't cut it on stage. I'm not sure he contributed much in the songwriting department either. So he had a good voice and was a nice guy........it's not enough.

I wish Paul the best in his future but let's be honest, the other members are different class and Baz has proved that he is worthy.

Baz can write, sing and pull it of live. He is a Strangler !

I have talked to so many people who stopped going to see the band. Not because they were minus Hugh, but because they were plus paul.

Paul didn't have the persona for fronting this mega band live and the majority in the crowd saw through that. I have talked to a lot of people who are going to see the band now that Paul is gone.

Again, I wish him the best but the band are sooooo much stronger now that they have no passengers.

See you all at the Glasgow gig.



AL,

Cincinnati, Ohio
BELLE 77

it took 16 years to get used to a frontman
version of the stranglers and 1 opening
song at Bilston to forget all about him.
Good luck and best wishes to paul
but this was never a frontman band.
Belle Smile
yellowcakeuf6

Laughing Crying or Very sad Question
Homer

Question

so the 'Protected message' says fcuk all then Rolling Eyes
kinski

Homer wrote:
Question

so the 'Protected message' says fcuk all then Rolling Eyes


Or does it?
BELLE 77

the protected message may
be in brail for the deaf to see it. Confused Wink Question
jem750

Easy to say after the event, but my first thoughts when I first saw Baz with the band were:

They could ditch Paul and become a 4 piece again......

He just seemed a Strangler from the start, have seen a few of his solo performances and appreciated some real talent.

Think the best ever was at Pontins, Sundevils, Sat morning? Fucking awesome! Keep on rocking in the freeworld!

Jez
Damian

All very interesting this but I can't remember anyone saying 'ditch Paul go back to a 4 piece' before he left.
doninblack

Damian wrote:
All very interesting this but I can't remember anyone saying 'ditch Paul go back to a 4 piece' before he left.


Well I did say this at the end of my review on here of the Glasgow QMU gig back in November 2002...

"...I just can’t see this band getting big again with Roberts in the fold. So the best bet would be to dump him, and get JJ and Baz to share the vocal duties... I know this ain’t gonna happen though."

Which is why I think the move back to a four piece is a positive move, albeit a bit of a surprise that it actually happened.

Shocked Twisted Evil
Dom P

doninblack wrote:
Damian wrote:
All very interesting this but I can't remember anyone saying 'ditch Paul go back to a 4 piece' before he left.


Well I did say this at the end of my review on here of the Glasgow QMU gig back in November 2002...

"...I just can’t see this band getting big again with Roberts in the fold. So the best bet would be to dump him, and get JJ and Baz to share the vocal duties... I know this ain’t gonna happen though."

Which is why I think the move back to a four piece is a positive move, albeit a bit of a surprise that it actually happened.

Shocked Twisted Evil


So back to the subject of thread, it's actually your fault Don. A web spy reported back your post to management and someone went "hmmmm, that's an idea..." The fact that Baz could cut it was a welcome bonus.

Could be ... Shocked Very Happy
doninblack

Dom P wrote:
doninblack wrote:
Damian wrote:
All very interesting this but I can't remember anyone saying 'ditch Paul go back to a 4 piece' before he left.


Well I did say this at the end of my review on here of the Glasgow QMU gig back in November 2002...

"...I just can’t see this band getting big again with Roberts in the fold. So the best bet would be to dump him, and get JJ and Baz to share the vocal duties... I know this ain’t gonna happen though."

Which is why I think the move back to a four piece is a positive move, albeit a bit of a surprise that it actually happened.

Shocked Twisted Evil


So back to the subject of thread, it's actually your fault Don. A web spy reported back your post to management and someone went "hmmmm, that's an idea..." The fact that Baz could cut it was a welcome bonus.

Could be ... Shocked Very Happy


Three cheers for web spy.
Damian

doninblack wrote:
Dom P wrote:
doninblack wrote:
Damian wrote:
All very interesting this but I can't remember anyone saying 'ditch Paul go back to a 4 piece' before he left.


Well I did say this at the end of my review on here of the Glasgow QMU gig back in November 2002...

"...I just can’t see this band getting big again with Roberts in the fold. So the best bet would be to dump him, and get JJ and Baz to share the vocal duties... I know this ain’t gonna happen though."

Which is why I think the move back to a four piece is a positive move, albeit a bit of a surprise that it actually happened.

Shocked Twisted Evil


So back to the subject of thread, it's actually your fault Don. A web spy reported back your post to management and someone went "hmmmm, that's an idea..." The fact that Baz could cut it was a welcome bonus.

Could be ... Shocked Very Happy


Three cheers for web spy.


Yes Don you are personally responsible for someone getting the sack!
gadge

new line up

have got the new album and it's the best thing they've done for over 25 years - I'm really proud of the lads
lots of energy [esp. Summat Outanowt, A Soldier's Diary], great bass, superb keyboards [back to rollercoaster organ of late 70s on eg She's Slipping Away, Relentless], some great songs [Bless You, Anything Can Happen, Unbroken, and superb vocals [!]
such a shame baz hadn't come along in 1990............................
theraven1979

Hang on a mo - Let's not forget those early 90s gigs with Paul and John - THE best live band at the time

Jim
Homer

Have to agree with Jim there, first tour with Paul was amazing......I remember doing Newcastle Riverside,Leeds Warehouse and Norwich,The Waterfront.......middle of the red light district Razz
yellowcakeuf6

Homer wrote:
and Norwich,The Waterfront.......middle of the red light district Razz


ahem.............................. Embarassed

A quality 'local' venue for quality 'local' people

(If you can call a knackered pink sodium light and a couple of auld munters a 'red light district'?) Twisted Evil

Still............................If you're at a loose end?!?
ALV2500

The 2002 QMU gig was great even if I did travel 3000 miles to see it. of course, the wankers who think it's cool to throw beer at the band need to be bitch slapped ( I talked to JJ about it at the Montreal gig 2 years later and he was still pissed off about it and rightly so )

Something tells me the next Glasgow gig will be better. The new line up will be there and hopefully the beer throwing arse wipes will stay home.

AL
mctownie

After seeing the gig last night at Nantwich I cant wait for the proper gigs in September.

Baz's vocals were superb, there was a great confidence about him and the band and Baz and JJ sharing the vocals together was brilliant. They do not need or miss PR one bit!
GlasgowToiler

Interesting theories...

Have to say, when Hugh left, a load of mates chucked it...

I persevered, went to the King Tuts in Glasgow gig and was blown away..

But this could have been a mixture of welcoming PR, being treated to every classic and being so close to the band...I was Impressed....

Over the years I continued to buy the albums and go see the band but gradually PR began pissing me off, so much that I referred to him as the Stranglers Poseur Confused

Was at the ABC in Glasgow recently and once again was blown away...

Can't wait till they come back..... Laughing
rugbyinblack

Would Paul have left? Yes of course he would. Why should he stick around when A) so called fans give him crap b) the band give him crap. This site appears to be a collection of archeologists. Paul and to a lesser extent John kept the band alive and so called fans gave them crap for doing so. Hugh hasn't had a voice since he left the band BEF? What a waste of recording time, it almost matches his tour of cash points such as Allendale in Northumberland playing to 50 people must have been a high point for him, the only good thing to come from his music is the drumming of Chris Bell.

The only thing now is that Paul will release music that JJ couldn't understand and that JJ will hopefully start to write music that he should have been 16 years ago.
jem750

rugbyinblack wrote:
Would Paul have left? Yes of course he would. Why should he stick around when A) so called fans give him crap b) the band give him crap. This site appears to be a collection of archeologists. Paul and to a lesser extent John kept the band alive and so called fans gave them crap for doing so. Hugh hasn't had a voice since he left the band BEF? What a waste of recording time, it almost matches his tour of cash points such as Allendale in Northumberland playing to 50 people must have been a high point for him, the only good thing to come from his music is the drumming of Chris Bell.

The only thing now is that Paul will release music that JJ couldn't understand and that JJ will hopefully start to write music that he should have been 16 years ago.


Interesting observations in a week where The Stranglers & Hugh are touring and the overwhelming opinion seems to be that they are at their peak Rolling Eyes
mctownie

Having seen the band 5 times without Paul and gone to those gigs with a number of people who had seen them with and without him there was a unanimous conclusion :

The band are better without him both live and on record. They look and sound like the Stranglers again - not Pauls fault necesarily but they are the facts.
gizzard

mctownie wrote:
Having seen the band 5 times without Paul and gone to those gigs with a number of people who had seen them with and without him there was a unanimous conclusion :

The band are better without him both live and on record. They look and sound like the Stranglers again - not Pauls fault necesarily but they are the facts.


Very true mctownie and I agree.
Ian9331

The Stranglers with a frontman doesn't work. Be it PR or whoever. People I know who have liked and seen The Stranglers MK1 say they just couldn't take to him. But, if it wasn't for Paul Roberts when Hugh suddenly announced his departure would The Stranglers still be together now? Currently Hugh on top form again for the first time in years..... does he feel 'Threatened'? Cool
Michael

Well, I think that Paul did a good job and certainly gave 100%. I have only had the pleasure of seeing the band in concert twice (once in Hannover and once in Portadown) both times with Paul as the front man - both were excellent. Some of the albumn tracks the band have produced in the post Hugh days before Pauls departure were briliant and his singing talents brought to the fore. With better PR etc chart sussess would surely have occurred. Time to Die, Heaven or Hell, Sinister, Golden Boy, In Heavan she Walks, Valley of the Birds, Lost Control to name a few. Paul was not Hugh and Baz is not Paul, each vocalist has brought his own style and prescence to the group, enabaling the band to move in different musical directions and develop their talents further. Good luck to Paul, better luck to The Stranglers.
ravenlunatic

As I have stated before, I loved the band with Hugh, but was happy to accept the great talent of Paul as a means for the band to carry on in some form. I look back on Pauls years as a kind of stasis, a living museum with Paul as the curator, keeping the legend alive until one day fate would decree that another would come along and allow the magic to return. To me, Baz is the one for whom we have all waited so patiently.
But it is interesting to hear the opinion of those outside the circle of hardcore fans, and I had an interesting chat with the landlord of a local pub last weekend. I was sporting my Suite XVI T shirt and he asked me if I had ever seen the Stranglers, I laughed and assured him that I was something of an enthusiast, and that I had seen them 4 times in one week recently. He went on to say that he had seen the band with Hugh a few times and then went to see them with "that long haired bloke who carried on like some fucking kareoke singer" (his words, not mine). He said that "that bloke" kept doing all sorts of "strange things" (he went on to perform a number of very realistic head flicking/finger clicking/mic.swinging impressions!) And concluded that after that he had considered the band a lost cause. I of course bought him up to speed with member changes and album releases, and urged him to give them another go. He was pleased to hear what I had said and thought that he would give them a listen, and even went on to suggest that we give him a shout next time we go and see them live.
Now the thing is, this is almost exactly the same conversation I have had a dozen times with different people over the last couple of months. I really feel that there are a lot of lapsed fans out there who are finding themselves attracted to the band once more, if only they could find about the band from some sort of publicity rether than casual conversations, but of course that in itself is another subject.
johnny sox

would paul have left if baz

I fully agree to forum member almv2500. Paul had a good voice but he hadn't the same charisma as Hugh. The Paul era albums sound okay but I've only visited 2 Paul Roberts era shows because of his poor aura.
I think Paul is also responsible for the new, completely different stranglers sound. Most of the stranglers fans had Dreamtime and 10 in mind when "Stranglers in the Night" was released. This album was okay but it was much too different of what the fans had in their ears for so many years. The music of "Stranglers in the Night" may have higher standards but the fans wanted a Dreamtime or 10 encore. Is Paul's new band called "The Changeling"?
johnny sox

would paul have left if baz

Sharing money into 4 is more fun than into 5, eh?
jem750

ravenlunatic wrote:
As I have stated before, I loved the band with Hugh, but was happy to accept the great talent of Paul as a means for the band to carry on in some form. I look back on Pauls years as a kind of stasis, a living museum with Paul as the curator, keeping the legend alive until one day fate would decree that another would come along and allow the magic to return. To me, Baz is the one for whom we have all waited so patiently.
But it is interesting to hear the opinion of those outside the circle of hardcore fans, and I had an interesting chat with the landlord of a local pub last weekend. I was sporting my Suite XVI T shirt and he asked me if I had ever seen the Stranglers, I laughed and assured him that I was something of an enthusiast, and that I had seen them 4 times in one week recently. He went on to say that he had seen the band with Hugh a few times and then went to see them with "that long haired bloke who carried on like some fucking kareoke singer" (his words, not mine). He said that "that bloke" kept doing all sorts of "strange things" (he went on to perform a number of very realistic head flicking/finger clicking/mic.swinging impressions!) And concluded that after that he had considered the band a lost cause. I of course bought him up to speed with member changes and album releases, and urged him to give them another go. He was pleased to hear what I had said and thought that he would give them a listen, and even went on to suggest that we give him a shout next time we go and see them live.
Now the thing is, this is almost exactly the same conversation I have had a dozen times with different people over the last couple of months. I really feel that there are a lot of lapsed fans out there who are finding themselves attracted to the band once more, if only they could find about the band from some sort of publicity rether than casual conversations, but of course that in itself is another subject.


You are spot on my friend, I have stuck with the band through thick and thin but know many 'lapsed' fans who basically all said the same thing.

They too have returned to the fold Very Happy I took 6 friends to various gigs on this tour!

Jez (Bet you didn't know I had 6 friends Laughing)
Bobinblack

Damian wrote:
All very interesting this but I can't remember anyone saying 'ditch Paul go back to a 4 piece' before he left.


This is my debut post even tho I've been a fan since Hugh's day.

Paul seemed fine as a frontman to me, and I saw him more than a few times. Me, I didn't ever really take to his singing but regardless, he was a good frontman and I think anyone who says he wasn't can't have been at the same gigs as me.

Good luck Paul - I hate to think that members of the band we love fall out but shit does happen. He's been singer for 16 years, methinks most of that time wasn't on a trial basis Wink

I do prefer Baz's singing, but most of all, I prefer JJ's.
theraven1979

I'd agree I guess but a bugger in a way that now Paul has left you realise they do need a well defined front man - both JJ and Baz talented as they are there doesn't seem to be any one up front driving. You sometimes wonder when the front man is gonna appear onstage

Jim

mctownie wrote:
Having seen the band 5 times without Paul and gone to those gigs with a number of people who had seen them with and without him there was a unanimous conclusion :

The band are better without him both live and on record. They look and sound like the Stranglers again - not Pauls fault necesarily but they are the facts.
AlwaysTheSun

the years after hugh left were an absolute debacle ellis with his grotesque guitar solos was pathetic and roberts was only marginally better.
puffinboots

The Stranglers were good and bad with Hugh, The Stranglers were good and bad with Paul, The Stranglers are good so far with Baz....
Hugh fans - go see Hugh, Stranglers fans - go see them, Baz solo fans - go see him, Paul fans - go see him, Burnel solo fans - go see him.
I've seen over 250 gigs in all there guises - they were all great for some reason. The Stranglers are still entertaining us...and there's still some that aren't happy - stop spending money on them then. there's fucking something for everyone in The Stranglers family! I think calling ANY ex and current member "talentless" is a shit attitude.
Bobinblack

Thanks for the advice there Puffinboots - can I go see The Strangs AND Hugh because I like them both? Razz

To be fair, people are entitled to their opinions about their fave line up but what the hell does it matter? Without being critical of any of them, I'm sure the band(s) are happy as long as people are buying their stuff and paying to see them, are they bothered about our opinions?

Must admit, I've seen the band and Hugh & band a few times this year, and whilst loving the Stranglers gigs, I was more excited at Hugh's Rolling Eyes

Still, there was hardly anyone at his gigs - their loss is what I say, his Stranglers versions were bloody great!
adam_neil

Bobinblack wrote:

Must admit, I've seen the band and Hugh & band a few times this year, and whilst loving the Stranglers gigs, I was more excited at Hugh's Rolling Eyes

Still, there was hardly anyone at his gigs - their loss is what I say, his Stranglers versions were bloody great!


Aye.

On the last tour I read reports of some poor turn-outs but out of the 4 Hugh shows I did this year. 3 were very well attended(St.Albans, Masham, Nottingham), 1 not so well attended (Newton-le-Willows).

An enthusiastic crowd always adds to a great gig but if Hugh delivers a good performance then thats all that matters. I can't wait for the March tour. Very Happy


Adam
Bobinblack

adam_neil wrote:
Bobinblack wrote:

Must admit, I've seen the band and Hugh & band a few times this year, and whilst loving the Stranglers gigs, I was more excited at Hugh's Rolling Eyes

Still, there was hardly anyone at his gigs - their loss is what I say, his Stranglers versions were bloody great!


Aye.

On the last tour I read reports of some poor turn-outs but out of the 4 Hugh shows I did this year. 3 were very well attended(St.Albans, Masham, Nottingham), 1 not so well attended (Newton-le-Willows).

An enthusiastic crowd always adds to a great gig but if Hugh delivers a good performance then thats all that matters. I can't wait for the March tour. Very Happy


Adam


I prefer being at the less-attended gigs cos I think you get more of a sort of attachment with them, plus of course you can get as close to the stage as you like with someone's armpit in your gob etc etc Laughing
**Dutchess**

Bobinblack wrote:
you can get as close to the stage as you like with someone's armpit in your gob


That reminds me of this thread... Laughing

http://www.thestranglerssite.co.uk/forums/viewtopic.php?t=7437

Mariet
Bobinblack

**Dutchess** wrote:
Bobinblack wrote:
you can get as close to the stage as you like with someone's armpit in your gob


That reminds me of this thread... Laughing

http://www.thestranglerssite.co.uk/forums/viewtopic.php?t=7437

Mariet

Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing
Mmm, human flesh is porky meat, no extra salt required.
pigeon

Paul did a good job in the stranglers and without him we won't have the lineup there is now. Paul was singer for the best gig i have seen the stranglers do at the sheperds bush empire on march 2nd 2002. He also wrote the songs "valley of the birds" "in heaven she walks" "in a while" "here" "sugar bullets" "heaven or hell" "sinister" "lost control" "brainbox" "grand canyon" which are all great songs.

The new line up is back to the four piece & the 10 times i have seen them so far my favourite gigs have been dartford july06, Manchester october 06, Paris 07 & the roundhouse. The next album is how good we will see this line up is as they can start from scratch without having to re record it in a rush release.

I think it's going to sound like black and white.
shah

I don't think there should be any blame on Paul.
Seems to me that the Stranglers picked him. So if there's any blame...
He fell into line, saluted the flag, wrote some good songs when JJ wasn't feeling up to it (About Time was a great effort relative to the work before and after), he always gave his all at the gigs, was always a nice guy and just wanted more of his songs considered. JJ was rejuvenated by Baz, the axis shifted and the sulking began.

Sure he was a bit narcissistic, sure he wasn't as acerbic as Hugh but he was bloody good on the block....and he knew the irony of it.
AlwaysTheSun

Shah i'm afraid About Time was pretty dreadful , just like all of the ellis-roberts efforts.
shah

I think it's relative.

Relative to ITN and WIR and CDG, AT was very good. I still enjoy 6/7 of the tracks when they shuffle around.

Relative to NC and S16, it's not very good.

Relative to B&W, Raven, MIB it's mundane drivel.
ThruBeingCool

Yup! I'll go with "relative"
Claireinblack

ThruBeingCool wrote:
Yup! I'll go with "relative"


Smilies....

Whatever next..

Laughing Wink
Jon the Impaler

shah wrote:
I think it's relative.

Relative to ITN and WIR and CDG, AT was very good. I still enjoy 6/7 of the tracks when they shuffle around.

Relative to NC and S16, it's not very good.

Relative to B&W, Raven, MIB it's mundane drivel.


Yes , but relative to B&W , The Raven .......... Aural and 10 are mundane drivel ....... to a far lesser extent I would say Dreamtime too . Those are the pinnacle (B&W, Raven ) . Thanks to Paul though the band are here still , we've had some good songs along the way , some dire too . But we've still got achoice of wheteher to see the band or not .....no Paul , there wouldn't be a choice these days in all probability ............ though I wonder if history had taken a different path , Dave Vanian or Alex Gifford became lead singer in 1990 ......... who knows Question
Mart

One track i just cant get my head around is Tonight, its painful to hear and god knows ive tried, put it on again last night and the lyrics are embarressing
Mart

Just wanted to get that off my chest
Jon the Impaler

Mart wrote:
One track i just cant get my head around is Tonight, its painful to hear and god knows ive tried, put it on again last night and the lyrics are embarressing


I can't even remember that track ..... must be a pretty insignificant one . Maybe I'll dig it out and listen . CDG ? WIR ? Must be one of those two .
Jon the Impaler

Maybe one day it will all be in a book , the reason Paul left , the reason JE left ..... we have the books No Mercy , Hugh's book , Song by Song ....... yet the era since Hugh , there's a great void of written material that I'm sure that us fans at least would love to read .
I think the only real way this will come about is a book from JJ .
pigeon

I think the only way we will get the real truth will be a book from Jet,paul or john, on the MK2 era, john ellis would be my choice as he gave a good analaysis of the MK2 albums when me and adam spoke to him

Adam Neil "What did you think of About time john?"

JE "the production was shit".
wadey1

ID LOVE TO READ A BOOK WRITTEN BY JET BLACK, HE IS SUCH A WITTY WISE MAN, IMAGINE HOW GOOD AN AUTOBIOGRAPHY OF HIS WOULD BE.
pigeon

Well while were waiting for that, we've got the Crass interview with Jet in the PDF to look forward to the next best thing.
yellowcakeuf6

wadey1 wrote:
ID LOVE TO READ A BOOK WRITTEN BY JET BLACK,


Mmmm. Me too................... (Tscchhkkkk! You'd have thought he'd have gotten around to it by now wouldn't you?) (Tssschhhkkkk.....call himself the Stranglers' drummer!!??!!?1)
gizzard

wadey1 wrote:
ID LOVE TO READ A BOOK WRITTEN BY JET BLACK,


Much Ado About Nothing. Question
suchi

Jon the Impaler wrote:
Maybe one day it will all be in a book , the reason Paul left , the reason JE left ..... ......there's a great void of written material ...............


Are we really bothered? Just a couple of of peripheral characters IMO.

There are more interesting raconteurs on this forum.
johnnyg1968

He is gone now and lets enjoy the best line up since mk1
mick12345

come on the baz
Andy Oushudno

Just been reading in my local evening paper, Express & Star.
Was surprised to see Paul Roberts is to appear in Cannock starring in the Panto, Aladdin!!! Embarassed
I hope to Christ he dosen't stage dive onto the kids in the front rows!!
Think I'll book a box this year just in case.

Watch out JJ he's behind you Exclamation Exclamation Exclamation
Arthur Streeb-Greebling

Andy Oushudno wrote:
Just been reading in my local evening paper, Express & Star.
Was surprised to see Paul Roberts is to appear in Cannock starring in the Panto, Aladdin!!! Embarassed
I hope to Christ he dosen't stage dive onto the kids in the front rows!!
Think I'll book a box this year just in case.

Watch out JJ he's behind you Exclamation Exclamation Exclamation


Laughing
NMH1965

johnnyg1968 wrote:
He is gone now and lets enjoy the best line up since mk1


I couldn't agree more!!

Confused
       MiB Forums Forum Index -> Rumours
Page 1 of 1